<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s new retweet feature: more good than bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mulvenna.org/retweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mulvenna.org/retweet/</link>
	<description>Gerry Mulvenna, Singer Songwriter and IT Support Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.mulvenna.org/retweet/comment-page-1/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulvenna.org/?p=519#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>Thanks Donal - I read Sean Bonner&#039;s post with interest and an ever open mind. His big complaints are the strangers&#039; avatars and compromising the existing RT functionality in clients. The avatar thing can be easily sorted I would hope, but it&#039;s down to the developers and users how things go with accommodating both types of retweets in clients. Time will tell - it certainly could go pear-shaped in many different directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Donal &#8211; I read Sean Bonner&#8217;s post with interest and an ever open mind. His big complaints are the strangers&#8217; avatars and compromising the existing RT functionality in clients. The avatar thing can be easily sorted I would hope, but it&#8217;s down to the developers and users how things go with accommodating both types of retweets in clients. Time will tell &#8211; it certainly could go pear-shaped in many different directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donal Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.mulvenna.org/retweet/comment-page-1/#comment-4011</link>
		<dc:creator>Donal Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mulvenna.org/?p=519#comment-4011</guid>
		<description>Good points all Gerry.

I think that the duplication issue is a double edged sword. Before, if I missed a popular RT by a follower I could be pretty sure to pick it up again further down the twitter stream by someone else. Now, I will never see it again. It&#039;s lost in the crowd.

I read Evan&#039;s article and I recommend Sean Bonner&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seanbonner.com/2009/11/11/twitters-new-retweet-feature/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; which covers some of your concerns and examines the duplication issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points all Gerry.</p>
<p>I think that the duplication issue is a double edged sword. Before, if I missed a popular RT by a follower I could be pretty sure to pick it up again further down the twitter stream by someone else. Now, I will never see it again. It&#8217;s lost in the crowd.</p>
<p>I read Evan&#8217;s article and I recommend Sean Bonner&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.seanbonner.com/2009/11/11/twitters-new-retweet-feature/" rel="nofollow">response</a> which covers some of your concerns and examines the duplication issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
